How biological motors achieve maximum efficiency

Inside nearly every cell of your body, the tiny F₁ motor works non-stop to create adenosine triphosphate (ATP), the universal energy source that powers almost every action you take—from breathing to running. While scientists have understood the structure of this molecular machine for years, a key mystery remained: how does its partner, the F₀ motor, spin F₁ with maximum efficiency?

ATP synthase is the enzyme that catalyzes the formation of ATP. It consists of both F₀ and F₁ motors, which are locked together. When F₀ spins, it forces the central shaft inside F₁ to spin as well. However, the details of how F₀ applies its force were not known.

To get to the bottom of the mystery, an international team of researchers isolated a single F₁ motor from Bacillus bacteria and forced it to spin in two different ways to make ATP. First, they applied a twisting, steady force (constant torque). Second, they used a technique called angle clamp, which constantly measured the motor’s position and instantly adjusted the force to keep it spinning at a steady speed and angle.

Comparing the two methods revealed a sharp difference in performance. The angle clamp technique was the most efficient as the steady, continuous motion eliminated wasted energy. The constant torque approach wasted energy because it allowed the motor to experience wobbling and jerking. The team validated their findings with computer simulations based on physical models of the motor.

“Our experiments, combined with theory and simulation, indicate that the angle clamp significantly suppresses the nonequilibrium variation that contributes to the futile dissipation of input work,” wrote the scientists in their paper published in Physical Review Letters.

The study’s results are more than just a matter of lab curiosity. Studying how the F₁ motor works could inform the design of more efficient artificial nanomachines and molecular motors. This means that microscopic devices used in applications from medicine to manufacturing could run on less energy and be just as efficient as their biological counterparts.

But there is an important catch to the research. The F₁ motor was studied in a laboratory setting (in vitro), not inside a living cell (in vivo), so it may not have captured the full complexity of the natural system where the motors interact with other components. Also, the angle clamp approach doesn’t exist in nature; it was a theoretical concept. Nonetheless, this study provides a strong understanding of the physics behind energy management at this tiny scale.

© 2025 Science X Network